Pink: Truth About Love Concert [updated]

I’ve enjoyed listening to Pink since I was in high school. In a time when I wasn’t allowed to watch television and the only way to watch videos via the internet was to use P2P programs like Limewire over a dial-up connection, I listened to the radio a lot. In Grade 12, I mostly listened to CBC Radio One, but there were many a night where I would be listening to 107.9’s Top 8 at 8. I won’t deny having a taste for pop music. It’s certainly the junk food of the audio world, but there is that easy comfort and repeat-ability to the various hooks.

I have always equated pop music with the essence of America (K-pop’s rise notwithstanding). I love America. When I was young, while folding newspaper inserts before delivery, I would listen to Casey Kasem on American Top 40. Listening to it, I felt like I was in the United States. Through the medium of radio, I was connected to the place of my birth, one that I adored. Even when I’m driving nowadays, I’ll listen to a Top 40 station and depending on the song, will feel like I’m driving in Florida again (though of my summers there, I also remember listening to some of the numerous hip hop/urban stations).

I am unabashedly a fan of Pink’s songs (though it’s not as if I publicly announce the music I admire). She has an excellent voice and can actually sing.

She is a prolific and successful songwriter in the pop world and throughout the past decade and change, I have enjoyed many of her hits. When I found out she was coming to Toronto, I grabbed a ticket.

Much like the Carrie Underwood concert, the crowd was mostly female. A lot of older women, lesbian couples, and more children <10 years old than I expected. Most people were white and by their clothing, not from Toronto (according to the stereotype I have of Torontonians).

Pink is a spokewoman for Cover Girl, so it was interesting seeing their sponsorship all over the place. They even showed a 60 sec commercial featuring Pink on the screens pre-showtime.

Cover Girl sampling.

Cover Girl sampling.

The Hives were the warm up act. I missed most of their show and didn’t hear any of the songs I’m familiar with.

The Hives.

The Hives.

They did a pseudo pre-show with a character we would see later on in the show. He was sort of a clown-type character in that he wore a very loud suit and was sitting in different parts of the arena. The camera would hone in on him as he mimed with various audience members. It wasn’t that funny, though think a better developed idea of this should be in other concerts to help pass the time.

Clown Host.

Clown Host.

The performance was supposed to start at 9pm, but didn’t start until ~9:20 PM. The clown guy was the host of the “Truth About Love” show of which Pink was the featured contestant/participant. It wasn’t quite clear how the “show” would be incorporated into the performances and in hindsight, it wasn’t really. The stage and set design was pretty cool for what I’ve seen (I can only imagine what a Lady Gaga concert would be like…)

Cool atmosphere.

Cool atmosphere.

Her singing for her opening songs was hard to hear. The mixing really sucked, but I guess it’s a tactic to hide a poor singing voice while doing a lot aerobic activity. Because later on during the acoustic sets or when she was flying in the air, the mix was a lot better and her voice was more prominent. Speaking of which, she did have a lot of acts up in the air. She said she liked it because she doesn’t get out of breath as opposed to dancing. Her aerial feats were pretty awesome. I was amazed that for many of them she and the dancers/aerialists didn’t rely on any harnesses or wrist holds. There was a spinning cage/globe thing where the guys were hanging on with their hands against the centrifugal force. Beast strength.

photo 4 (4)

One of the aerial spinning contraptions.

So to recap, Pink is not only a great singer but also an impressive aerialist. She’s a strong woman.

Throughout the concert, she sang a number of her hits, which I and the crowd enjoyed. The ending was a bit weird, because there were two separate “conclusions” instead of a definitive “encore”. However, the songs were great and her second last encore was a really cool thing where they use what I assume is the same setup for the Football skycams, but with her hanging from the cables. She literally zoomed all over the arena.

photo 2 (4)

Taking a break on a perch while harnessed to the skycam-like system.

It was really cool and afforded those in various seats around the arena to get a closer look at her. All in all, I had a fantastic time and will definitely go to her next concert!

[updated] March 15, 2013

Apparently, Pink is huge in Australia. With more concert dates there than in North America! Some cities have 8 performances scheduled.

 

Goodbye “Objects of Vision”

Seated Sculpture (1982)

Seated Sculpture (1982)

This was my last weekend volunteering before the Michael Snow – Objects of Vision exhibition leaves us. After the Evan Penney – ReFigured show, this has been my second favourite exhibit to interpret with visitors. It’s also a personal favourite because I have experienced tremendous enjoyment interacting with and observing the objects.

Seated Sculpture was my favourite work. You got to touch it! You were supposed to even sit inside of it!!! Sitting in there was serene. It was a welcome respite from the crowds at the AGO and a place of solitude that I enjoyed.

Sitting.

Sitting.

I loved interpreting this work with visitors because most people didn’t realize they were not just allowed to but supposed to sit in it! Then instead of just being a passive participant, I would inquire about how they felt inside of there. Of all the people I surveyed, there were two types of people. Those who felt discomfited being inside, as if the metal was enveloping them, trapping them. One person told me it felt like a coffin. Other people were like me, in that theyexperienced a calm wash over them. That it was peaceful.

Inside.

Inside.

I would also remind them about the theme of the exhibition, that the purpose of these objects were that they affected your vision, in either how you looked at the object itself or how the object directed your vision elsewhere. Here again, there were two sides. There were those who could only focus on the interior of the sculpture. Many mentioned a tunnel vision effect. While others felt their view “open” up, in that once their horizontal peripheral vision was blocked, they looked below and skywards.

Up.

Up.

During all of my sessions inside, I tended to look up. I loved the space and how open it was for the exhibition. The 70s or 80s era concrete architecture was pleasing to me. It wasn’t hideous like UWO’s Weldon Library or U of T’s Robarts Library. Instead, it was a reminder of the children’s tv show “Today’s Special” of which I have fond memories.

 

One other aspect of the interpretation is that it allowed the visitor to experience a cool side effect of Seated Sculpture, echo. Talking while inside of it produced a metallic echo as the sound waves of their voice reverberated throughout the sidewalls and back. Most people don’t think to talk while sitting inside, so the interpretation provided them the opportunity to do so.

I will also miss Transformer. I have spent much time observing it move. It’s tip pointing in a different direction each shift. Even in real time, it would change orientation due to the air circulation caused by visitors entering and exiting. Maybe also because of the occasions when I would blow air at it or fan it with my notebook, hehe. 

Transformer (1982)

Transformer (1982)

Interpreting this was also fun. Many people felt threatened by it, so I would play into that. I would talk about how it was suspended at chest height and have them stand right in front of the tip. We would then discuss that feeling and about our hearts. Centre mass. With younger folks, I’d have them bend down so that the point was at eye level. Depending on our conversation, I might have dropped a Final Destination movie reference…

Shadows...

Shadows…

Thanks for the experience. Farewell.

IKEA Family

photo 5

Caiman skull

March Break is upon us. There was an unusually high number of families with young children at the ROM. Because of this, we had more quality facilitations than normal. For me, the two memorable ones were with this mixed Asian-Caucasian girl and a family that looked like they belonged in an IKEA commercial.

The girl was about 8 or 9 and had really long bangs. Mixed race people are gorgeous, and she was very cute. My friend, Nancy, facilitated the birds and dinosaur table with her. I could tell from afar that the facilitation was going well. The girl looked at the objects with rapt attention and was responding to Nancy’s questions.

She then came over to my table, Teeth and Feeding. She immediately gravitated to the caiman. Most people have never heard of caimans and immediately assume the skull is that of an alligator, but she identified it correctly. I asked her if she had been here before. She said no. I don’t know why she would lie, but she seemed to know every object on the table, suggesting she had been through the specimens before. Nancy posited that she may have been here but had never received a full on facilitation, which may be true. She was quite attentive throughout our exploration of each skull. She knew “carnivore” but seemed to have not been exposed to the words “herbivore” and “omnivore”. For the first time, I used the analogy of a person doing a belly flop vs diving into water to explain the loon skull’s hydrodynamic (aerodynamic equivalent underwater) design. We went through all of the specimens on the table. When we concluded, she went to the skins table where Nancy rounded out her touch table experience. I would say that we average one awesome facilitation each shift. She was mine for that night. Facilitation with kids like her is a major reason why I love being a part of the museum. Curiosity FTW!!!

There was a mother, father, and son that night who looked like models in an IKEA commercial. The father wore a canvas-like spring jacket, slim pants (that weren’t hipsterish), and sported the beginnings of a pot-belly. The mother had a nice black outfit on with this shawl draped over her shoulder. The son looked like an average happy 7 year old. They were a really good looking family. What really left an impression on me was that the boy put on one of the turtle costume we have, and then the father put on our other turtle costume. They both wandered around the gallery for a few minutes with the costumes on.

The boy didn’t seem to get really into the facilitations. Nancy really had to work to get him interested with the Indian python skin, but he eventually got into it and understood how a snake’s scales help it slither forward. When he came to my table, he wasn’t engaged with much except for the shark jaw. I facilitated the table and talked with the mom and dad for a bit as they described their experience witnessing an alligator in the Florida Everglades launch into the air to snatch a bird in mid-flight. Apparently, the park ranger they told about their experience had never seen or heard about that type of alligator behaviour.

Anyways, they were a really good-looking family with what seemed to be a genuine familial bond. The vibe I got from observing and talking to them fits with my favourite IKEA commercial.

IKEA “Long Live the Home” from TWC Films on Vimeo.

Area 4 Contest

photo 1

This area contest has been a huge monkey on my back. Organizing volunteers from all 4 clubs and relying on each club’s leadership to obtain them… Not having a target/test speaker until only a few nights before… Thank goodness I got David to be Chief Judge. His help was needed and proved to be most reliable. I was able to leave all of the contest judging responsibilities in his hands.

Overall, it was a decent contest. This contest’s attendance of 35 was around the same attendance as the fall contest (31), though I felt I had things under better control then (though this may be looking at the past through rose tinted glasses).

photo 2

photo 3

photo 4

The Power of Quartz

 

Glass stairs between the 3rd and 4th floors at the Four Seasons Centre.

Glass stairs between the 3rd and 4th floors at the Four Seasons Centre.

On Saturday, Mar. 2, I did my poster desk shift for the Nijinsky 2PM performance. When I came through the stage door, there was a guy with a wicked beard that would have made ZZ Top proud. He turned out to be a violin soloist or something because he took a bow on stage after the performance. I saw Elena Lobsonova looking at some scheduling sheets. I chickened out and didn’t bother to ask her for an autograph. I had just gone through the stage door, my programmes were in my bag… I’m a wuss.

As I proceeded down the hall, I passed Skylar Campbell. I recognized him as a dancer, but didn’t realize that he was playing the lead Nijinsky role, his first solo performance. The choreographer, John Neumeier, picked him out during class and has elevated Skylar for this moment out of the Corps. I didn’t get Skylar’s autograph either cause he seemed as if he was looking for someone.

This was the very first public performance of Nijinsky in Canada. It was also the first time the pre-show Ballet Talks were being held in the theatre as opposed to the third floor. It made me sad because one of the reasons I love volunteering at Poster Desk is that I get to listen to the Ballet Talk. It was eerily quiet throughout the atrium and especially the third floor because everyone was inside. Normally, there is a audible buzz as people mingle on the different floors. The Ballet Talks used to draw a huge crowd to the third floor filling the area with a stimulating energy.

They didn’t even broadcast the talk on the tv screens 🙁

Some subscribers weren’t aware of the time change for the talk. It used to be 45 min before show time but has now been moved a little bit ahead to 60 min prior. A woman showed up to the third floor and complained to an usher that her ticket said 1:15pm.  Guess she didn’t get the email or visit the website. Subscribers apparently get their entire season’s worth of tickets as a group very early on.

Something else to add to the whole deal was that the glass staircase from the third to fourth floors was closed. One of the platforms had shattered! Apparently, a woman dropped a quartz pendant necklace and it caused a massive spiderweb of cracks. Perhaps the quartz had a perfect aligned resonance to the tempered glass? The platform held together like a car windshield but the damage was quite evident. This affected the exit of the crowd after the performance as people from the fifth, fourth, and part of the third floors took the emergency stairwell to ground level, bypassing the Poster Desk. This hurt sales.

You can see the top of the platform is not flat because of the damage.

You can see the top of the platform is not flat because of the damage. They have laid some sort of mat on top.

photo 5 (2)

It’s dark because of the mat, but you can see that it looks like a million mosaic pieces. Those are the shattered glass pieces.

I didn’t notice much of a difference in the performance between Guillame and Skylar. Other than the fact that he is only 20 or something, which is impressive for such a physical, choreographically challenging, and prominent role, nothing really stood out to me. I didn’t really care for this ballet. The music was nice, but like the Seagull, I was bored during Act II. I fell asleep for a good 10 min (willingly, I didn’t fight the drowsiness). I completely missed the military/soldier scene.

On my way out the stage door, there was a crowd of people by security. I saw John Neumeier coming behind me. Having realized the night before I could have gotten his autograph for The Seagull, I got out my 2011-2012 Programme. I don’t know if he recognized me, but I said, “Mr. Neumeier could you please sign my programme? For The Seagull?” He said, “Sure” in his very soft voice. He had an assistant or someone with him who kindly held my other Programme for me as I fumbled for a pen. Another lady who was inside the stage door asked for his autograph as well, and Neumeier asked to use my pen for that.

After all of this, a man and woman in their 40s approached him saying, “Mr. Neumeier, we are Skylar’s parents. We wanted to thank you for giving Skylar this amazing opportunity.” I made my exit at that time, but I imagine they had a nice conversation.

 

 

 

Nijinsky Dress Rehearsal

I met up with Yuen after I finished my workout at the YMCA. We headed down to The Bay because she had to exchange a shirt for her dad. I remarked to her that the NYC Macy’s flagship store on 34th Street was pretty much like The Bay. There are a few more historical architectural elements in Macy’s, such as the wooden escalators and row of elevators, but all in all, they are both slightly renovated but still a bit shabby.

For dinner we went to Ravi Soups. It’s on Adelaide St. which to me is a barren, condo and industrial wasteland. It’s a place where if Toronto had a high crime rate, I would expect to get mugged. The eatery is not very visible on the outside, and it has a very simple interior. The restaurant is highly regarded though.

The Porcini Mushroom Wild Rice soup is a popular offering (and was very good according to Yuen). What’s interesting about the place is that there isn’t that much seating and they have a long communal table made out of a single log. It was a beautiful table from what must have been a magnificent tree. I didn’t take a picture of it, but sit down meals are served on a wooden lazy susan. Not very practical because it was a bit wobbly, but a quirky feature nonetheless.

Communal Table

Ravi Soups’ Communal Table

The table reminded me of this Portlandia sketch about Communal Dining.

We went to the Nijinsky dress rehearsal. I enjoyed the music and the sets. Made me wonder what a Neumeier Nutcracker would be like, because Nijinsky had some crazy sets. Circular light objects rising and lowering, a 1900s theatre or ballroom set that disassembles before the audience, an ocean liner scene…

I saw Sonia Rodrigues and Piotr Stanczyk sitting in the orchestra level, but they disappeared at intermission, so couldn’t nab Sonia’s autograph. I saw a bunch of apprentices also, but I got most of them at the Giselle dress rehearsal. The choreographer, John Neumeier, was there. Sitting near Karen Kain and Rex Harrington… Before the intermission ended and as he was sitting down at his desk, I got the courage to go up to him and ask for his autograph. He was very intense but signed my programme on the Nijinsky page without any qualms. I asked if he had a favourite ballet. “No.”

 

Another Attempt

I’ve had several iterations of this blog before. It first started in 2004 when I went to Taiwan and maintained a Blogger blog called Wei Shen Me (“Why” in Chinese).

In 2005, I bought this domain before embarking on my first summer working at Walt Disney World. I’ve kept the URL since.

I’ve deep sixed each of the previous blogs and am starting anew once more.

I hope to keep this blog as a place to chronicle my experiences, maintain journals of my various activities, and maintain a repository of anecdotes and thoughts as they may arise.

Here goes nothing.